Monday, November 30, 2009
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Media Mediatation #8 Isn’t Everything News to Somebody?
Why not blog about blogging in my blog? First off, about this video I found, “Blogs in Plain English”. The video is just that, it simplifies (simple solutions!) the whole idea of blogging and why people do it pretty simply. The production techniques used are pretty simple yet they were probably pretty time consuming for the producers to put together. A voiceover speaks over pieces of paper that are labeled and color coded symbols to get across the point. A real live finger can be seen moving the pieces around in a logical matter while a marker draws paths connecting necessary points.
I wasn’t so much into the idea of creating a blog for myself in this class because I wasn’t sure who (other than Rob) would read it. I never thought I was very interesting to read let alone had interesting things to talk about but as this video points out, that’s okay. “People like you have the power of the media, a personal kind of news that appeals to a high number of small audiences.” In this web 2.0 world, blogs allow us, anyone, to get a message out there. It’s amazing that we never had this power before; Neil Postman wouldn’t know what to think about it! When he was writing his text, the "news" was chosen and writen by a reporter and then went to a tiny group of people who decided what would be broadcasted to the masses. While we still see this way of reporting today, it's not the only method we have thanks to things such as blogs.
I don’t follow too many blogs other than some of my fellow classmates, teachers and friends that I know personally. I feel as though people only read blogs if they know the person writing them or if they care about the content. I find myself skimming through Tweets clicking on links of blogs that sound as though they have an interesting new post up, often the topic has to do with social media. Next, I find myself not only skimming that blog, but clicking on hyperlinks they have and other sites and authors they recommend. Before too long, I have 10 windows open and don’t even remember which Tweet I started at.
Here's a cool list of 25 Social Media Blogs.
Media Meditation #7 Burton Does It Again
So the first thing that really got me about this video is the fact that it is a video at all! When I think about clothing lines, I think right away of catalogs, glossy, paper catalogs that I find in my mailbox, technological shift to be able to see a catalog on youtube.com. In this video, Burton is showing off their 2010 women’s line. What better way to showcase these jackets than to allow customers to see exactly how they fit on someone, how they move and how they zip or button up. No words are spoken, just images, an epistemological shift. The production technique used in this video is pretty unique as well, each girl puts on a jacket and then takes it off and tosses it out of the camera shot, the next scene, showcasing a totally different back drop has a new jacket falling from the angel the previous girl threw it. Cool tricks, simple yet clever.
The 4 minute long video catches the attention of my limbic brain right off with the repetitive beats that are playing in the background, Davey Rocket's “Upbeat Heartbreak” to be exact. Another thing that catches me (and my limbic brain) in the video are the gorgeous backdrops that change every time the jacket changes. I would expect to see all snow but Burton is keeping it fresh by showing that their jackets and apparel can be sported not just on the slopes with their shots of fields, tunnels and streets in the flick. (Tapping into people’s emotions here with a bit of emotion transfer as they view each scene? I think so)
I found out about this video via Twitter when not only Burton Snowboards tweeted about it, showing us a personal shift but some others who had worked on it or were just giving shout outs to some of the girls in it. Another case of Twitter being a great marketing tool and way to spread a link around the Internet. The girls in the video are professional riders on the Burton Women’s Team along with some of the Shop Girls. Pretty cool to see people you look up to modeling a coat you could be wearing… persuasive technique of using beautiful people.
Rad. Corporate. Good day.
Friday, November 27, 2009
Media Meditation #6 Is What You See Really What You Get?
Paula Deens – Savannah Georgia (Food TV Network Show)
Grovers – Buffalo, NY (Diners, Drive Ins, Dives)
Holy Canoli – Worchester, MA (Phantom Gourmet)East Coast Grill – Boston, MA (Phantom Gourmet)
Super Duper Weenie – Fairfield, CT (RoadFood.com)Peter Lugers Steakhouse – Brooklyn, NY (Steak Paradise)
PJ Clarke’s – New York City (Hamburger Heaven)Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Media Meditation #5 Wait... WHAT?
Caila and I went in to Elaine Young’s office the other morning to have her answer some questions for us and we left her office with even more questions than we started with. Elaine brought to our attention the news of a recent study that was released by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issuing new breast cancer screening guidelines. “The task force now recommends against routine mammography screening for women before age 50 years and suggests that screening end at age 74 years." Although I strongly disagree with this whole recommendation, this media meditation is more about the different places on the Internet you can get your information. Who should you trust? Who should you listen to?
Elaine made her Facebook status (and sent a Tweet) saying, “WTF? Don’t teach BSE, no screening til 50! Imagine impact on “preventative” health care coverage.” And then included a link to an article about the issue on Medscape.com. As Clive Thompson tells us in his text, “Brave New World of Digital Intimacy”, once you post something on the News Feed feature on Facebook, it is available for all your friends to see whether they click on your page or not, what a great way to get the word out about this new reccomendation. Elaine also included the hashtag, “#womenshealth” which I’m sure draws huge numbers on the search feature of Twitter as we learned in the text, “How Twitter Will Change the Way We Live”. So now, all of Elaine’s followers know the facts, but where do people turn too next? My guess is they will visit their most trusted websites and blogs for more information and viewpoints, this shows a personal shift of the Internet.
I figured another source people may go to in order to find out more information and form their own individual meanings would be the American Cancer Society’s website. The interface of the website had a link front and center leading you to their viewpoint on the matter. Interesting to me that you somewhat had to scan the page in order to find the link but at the same time, it was front and center compared to the other links across the top.
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Media Meditation #4 Perez Hilton, My Mom & The Dude at the Bar on Adam Lambert
"You know honestly, if I offended some people… it's apples and oranges. I'm not an artist that does things for every single person. I believe in artistic freedom and expression, I believe in honoring the lyrics of a song, and those lyrics aren't really for everybody either." - Adam Lambert (Taken from PerezHilton.com, interview with Ryan Seacrest)
Unfortunately (or not) I didn’t catch the American Music Awards on Sunday night but I sure caught all the highlights. Whether it was from skimming through Tweets, reading Facebook status updates or looking at YouTube.com videos, I couldn’t miss hearing about all the drama of the night from Jennifer Lopez’s fall and Lady Gaga’s outfit (check out my friend Corey's blog here to hear more about what Lady Gaga has been up too) to Adam Lambert’s risqué performance. “Everyone” posting about it online is an example of a personal shift in the way information is passed around. Just like in Feed, even though I wasn’t searching for this information per say, it was sure being given to me. Even outside of the Perez Hilton social media world, my mom asked me if I saw Adam’s debut performance of his new single and so did my male friend at the bar on Monday night. (Bar on a Monday night? It’s Thanksgiving break… come on!) It’s amazing to me how everyone in America seems to know about this gay man’s provocative performance during a music awards show on TV yet we don’t know how many of our own citizen’s are being killed in Iraq or Afghanistan right now. This is an example of one of our seven basic principles, “reality” construction; the media shows us clips, photos and words on Adam’s performance to put us into this world where that is the most important news fact.
Many people enjoyed Adam’s performance on Sunday night but at the same time, many disagreed with it. A good example of individual meaning here, some people look at his performance as him being a positive gay role model, others think it was . Lambert performed his newest single, For Your Entertainment. During the gig, he simulated oral sex with a male dancer as well as made out with one of the male band members. He also grabbed his crotch multiple times. Lambert responded to the backlash of this performance by saying, "There's a big double standard, female pop artists have been doing things provocative like that for years, and the fact that I'm a male, and I'll be edited and discriminated against could be a problem. People are scared and it's really sad, I just wish people could open their minds up and enjoy things, it's all for a laugh, it's really not that big of a deal." (Taken from PerezHilton.com) This is interesting to think about the double standard because remember when Britney Spears and Madonna made out on national television? Yup, everyone loved it and posts online were nothing but praise.
When I Googled Adam Lambert’s name to try and out more information on the performance and what happened, I was bombarded with articles about it. Perez had an opinion (of course) and so did many “news sources” such as MTV, USA Today and ABC News. The AMA are produced by ABC, also important to note is the fact that ABC apparently got 1,500 complaints about the performance after it aired on the east coast. Turns out, they didn’t air the performance when the show played for the west coast audience and it’s interesting to note that I could only find the video of the performance on Perez’s website! I searched Google videos and Youtube.com and couldn’t find one of his actual performance at all, only something that was previous rehearsal for the live performance which I have embedded below for your viewing pleasure.
Most important to note throughout all this is although Adam made a lot of people upset with his performance, he made thousands talk about him.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Media Meditation #3 Finding Your Place on the Book
Sunday, November 8, 2009
The News That Didn't Make the News
Ecuador's Constitutional Rights of Nature...
Quick recap, Ecuador is located along the North West side of South America. It's population is approximately 13.2 million people and it's a Spanish speaking country.
The story of Ecuador's constitutional rights of nature outlines as followed...
- In September 2008, Ecuador became the first country in the world to declare constitutional rights of nature. These rights installed a new system of environmental protection on the country by redefining people's relationship with nature. The laws asserted that nature is not just an object but rather a rights-bearing entity that should be treated with parity under the law.
- Other countries are becoming interested in this constitution and beginning to draft plans of their own however it's not all working out as perfectly as planned. "I expect them to fight it, their bread and butter is based on being able to treat countries and ecosystems like cheap hotels. Multinational corporations are dependent on ravaging the planet in order to increase their bottom line" says Mari Margil, associate director of the Environmental Legal Defense Fund.
- A mining law introduced by the president of Ecuador, Correa, and backed by Canadian companies is proof that although the constitution looks good on paper, it really comes down to money and how it can be obtained. The President argues that allowing this extensive mining will bring "well being and relieve poverty" on his people which "overrules the rights of nature".
- Many are disappointed with the mining law that takes the "loopholes" in the rights-to-nature and "widens them" to get away with such extensive destruction. These indigenous leaders have filled a lawsuit deeming the project as unconstitutional yet as of now, nothing is being changed due to the loose wording of the constitution.
- The Los Angeles Times was the only US media outlet to cover the story. The published story trivialized the act by suggesting it sounded "like a stunt by the San Fransisco City Council" and that it seemed "crazy".
- Although there are struggles to ensure that the true meaning of the constitution is upheld, many believe that the nature laws could offer a path to an ecologically sustainable future and that all countries should be monitoring and learning from what is going on in Ecuador.
So I first threw the title of this story into a Google search and within .34 seconds had over 176,000 links appear in front of my face. Most of the links lead me to individuals blogs where they focused on topics such as nature, climate change, sustainable environments and different government bills and laws. Most of the sites I clicked around simply addressed the fact that Ecuador was passing this constitution and then either praised or dissed the idea and questioned if it was something all countries would see in the future. It was reassuring to see that individuals in the United States were aware of this story and pondering if the US could even instate such regulations and whether or not they would work.
I clicked on a link that brought me to Ecuador.com, the countries websites created by a group called "Ecuador Channel" along with a group called Paley Media. The website includes an article about the constitution reform and what it plans to say. It also says that the reform comes with mixed reactions but it gives people the opportunity to decide where they stand on the issue.
I next came across a blog called "Climate and Capitalism" that is an online journal focusing on capitalism, climate change, and the ecosocialist alternative that is published by Ian Angus. Ian wrote multiple books on the subject of climate change and previously hosted a blues music program called "Let the Good Times Roll" on CIUT-FM in Toronto. He states what the constitution actually says and how its being implemented and doesn't really throw his opinion into it, rather he allows readers to comment with their own thoughts.
Finally, I conducted a full search of all publications on Lexis Nexis and was surprised and glad to see 706 articles come up on the topic. I realize that not all of these articles covered the new constitution but the fact that it can be found at all is positive.
I then narrowed the search down to include only "major US and world publications" and the search was quickly narrowed down to three. Three newspapers, The New York Times, Korea Times and the Globe and Mail which is based in Canada. The New York Times article that was published Dec 14, 2008 is a bit skeptical about how the laws will actually be followed because of the poverty in Ecuador and also the fact that the scope of nature's rights is really unclear how it is written. "The text puts less emphasis on defending specific species than on the rights of ecosystems in large." The Times does say that this idea is a milestone for environmental organizations that seek to rewrite our treatment of nature. They also write that this constitution was passed in Ecuador by nearly 70 percent of voters.
The article in The Globe and Mail from Canada is extremely positive about the movement Ecuador has made. They acknowledge that it is the first country to have passed such laws and further explain that the new constitution gives many of the same rights to rivers, forests, plants and animals as it does to people. "People do not have to claim damage to themselves or their property in order to file a claim against those that harm the environment".
I was a little disappointed to find out that the article published in the Korea times didn't even have relevance to the topic at hand...
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Media Meditation #2 Birds' Eye View vs. Back to High School
Just to add to my media experience here, I got home from the show after saying my goodbyes to my Boston friend Carrie and logged into Facebook (obviously). Carrie had uploaded the following picture from her Blackberry just 20 minutes after I left the venue. The caption read "NFG set list and drumsticks. My life rules." I smiled as our mutual high school friends pushed the "like" button underneath this picture.